 |
|
Aug 10th, 2004 at 22:19:28 - Final Fantasy Tactics (PS) |
Been playing this for a couple of days. The first impression I got is that this game is HARD. I've played both of the Tactics Ogres, Disgaea, La Pucelle, virtually the entire Front Mission series, Sakura Taisen 1, 2 and 3, Fire Emblem (GBA), and FFT (GBA), so I'm not exactly a newcomer to the genre...
...And FFT is possibly the hardest TRPG I have encountered thus far.
First I have to mention the way in which the developers threw out some genre conventions. For instance, in the majority of the TRPGs preceding AND succeeding FFT, one could move a unit, then (if nothing else has been done with that unit) withdraw it back to its original position. Not so here; once your unit goes from Point A to Point B, that's it. This "feature" has exasperated me no end. In theory it's supposed to prevent "cheating", but in actual fact it simply amounts to withholding information from the player - information which is crucial for making proper tactical decisions.
Say I'm deploying an Archer to attack. I want to get her into range to fire upon a particular enemy, but the height system in the game means that some panels which SHOULD be within range of a longbow shot... aren't. Fine and good - but I can't tell whether any given firing position is valid until I move my Archer - and by the time I move her, it's too late to take the move back. I expected much, much better from the team behind the seminal Tactics Ogre.
Next are the added systems. What works and what doesn't?
Well, right off the bat I must say that I consider the Zodiac system a good idea with a pretty darn awful implementation. The interface for the system requires you to dig through about 3 levels of selection for EACH unit, in order to find out which units are "compatible" (compatible units deal higher damage to each other, which can seriously influence your decision-making). Why can't I select an option to instantly view which targets a particular unit will be more or less effective against? (I'll be making a little chart to let me check that "at a glance", but should any game really require players to go to that extent?)
The death system in FFT is pretty nasty. If one of your units falls in battle, you have 3 turns to bring him/her back to life, or they'll be gone forever. The worst part is that the Revive white magic spell (which is "supposed" to work as advertised)... has a chance of FAILURE! I have no idea what influences this, nor why in the world the developers chose to make this spell capable of fizzling, but it's incredibly frustrating and NOT fun to rush a mage to the spot ("Mediiiic!"), only to have their Revive spell fizzle and your unit bite the big one. (Thankfully, there IS a "soft reset" button combo in FFT.)
The Job system is interesting, but the "cross-learning" aspect is a little tricky. It appears that if one of your units gains JP (Job Points, used for learning abilities), the other units in your party also gain JP in that class. Which is fine, except that now I have a white mage with tons of JP in the Archer class... do I really have to shuffle the jobs around every battle just to maximise abilities? Sounds counter-intuitive at best.
Now on to what FFT does RIGHT - the timing system. I really like this - it's a logical extension of the system in the first Tactics Ogre, and works well.
In essence, the turn order takes place in pseudo-"real time", so that (for example) a unit which does absolutely nothing during its turn will take its next turn more quickly, and units with a better Speed rating get more frequent turns.
This is nothing new; what FFT adds to the mix is the idea of "delayed actions". Many actions in the game - mostly magic spells and Archer abilities - operate on a delayed timer - that is to say, they will go off a short while AFTER the unit's turn ends. This allows for some rather interesting situations - say an enemy mage is about to bomb your units with a massive spell; if the conditions are right, you can rush the mage and finish him off before he has time to cast it (VERY satisfying!). Alternatively, you could have the targeted unit charge into the midst of the enemy, and when the spell goes off it'll hit them as well as your unit. Archers are the epitome of the timing system; you can choose how long you want your archer's shot to be delayed (there's an option to shoot instantly too), and the longer it's delayed, the more powerful it will become. (Sadly, if the enemy moves, the shot will miss.)
There's a mix of good and bad in this game, but I'd say there's enough good to at least counterbalance the bad, so it looks like I'll be playing it for awhile.
read comments (3)  - add a comment  - read this GameLog  |
|
Aug 10th, 2004 at 21:39:22 - Parsec 47 (PC) |
Been awhile since I played this, but thankfully I haven't gone as rusty as I expected. 4.3M on Extreme-1 today, without "zoning" - that score was on my third run.
It's a good game to just pick up and play if you have a few minutes to spare, although I can see how it might be somewhat "draining" for some people.
add a comment - read this GameLog |
|
May 17th, 2004 at 22:13:28 - Parsec 47 (PC) |
Whoa.
- Neo
I had trouble getting into the correct mental state today, but on my last run (Ex-1 as usual), I managed to get it when I was at about 4 million points, with no lives remaining.
(Just a note: Parsec 47 is quite generous with extra lives; you get one every 500,000 points, but there's a maximum of 4 - and you can lose them very easily.)
I managed to ride the state up to 8,790,490 points - that's not only 1.3 times as much as my previous score, but higher than any score I've got on the game (even Practice level)!
add a comment - read this GameLog |
|
May 16th, 2004 at 12:00:14 - Parsec 47 (PC) |
"I understand now... The meaning of the AT Field."
- Asuka Langley, _The End of Evangelion_
NEO: What are you trying to tell me - that I can dodge bullets?
MORPHEUS: No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you're ready, you won't have to.
- _The Matrix_
I seem to have picked up on some sort of secret. By unfocusing my mind and my eyes, I gain greater focus.
Weird.
To put all this in context - I've been trying, for the past week or so, to beat my own high score for Extreme-1 (5,490,000). I couldn't even hit 80% of it at best. I tried most of the mental exercises and suchlike that people tend to talk about - you know, deep breathing, relaxation exercises, etc. No dice.
Then, reading over some people's accounts of gaming experiences "in the zone", I realised that one common experience was to go into a sort of "daydream state" where one is internally disconnected from the external reality of the game - perhaps in prosaic ways such as trying to solve a math problem or making up a shopping list, or daydreaming about whatever. Theory is that this suppresses the "fight or flight" response and dampens adrenaline shock - although I suspect there's more to it than that.
So on my next run, I went through the usual warmup regimen: 2 rounds at Ex-3, then 3 at Ex-5 and Ex-8 each, and finally 2 at Ex-15. The first score run on Ex-1 wasn't so good, but once I got the pattern down, I managed to hit 5,850,000. Took me about an hour, I guess.
Today I did score runs on Ex-1 again without a warmup(!), and scored 6,260,000. Perhaps the warmup cycle works if you're not using this technique, but is counterproductive if you are. Who knows?
I'm not sure that this can be applied to all games (even action games), though. FPS are a possible candidate for the technique. I suspect, also, that it takes a great deal of practice with a particular game to acquire the reflexes and visual discrimination necessary to survive in that game.
add a comment - read this GameLog |
|
|
 |
| Sparrow's GameLogs |
|
Sparrow has been with GameLog for 20 years, 8 months, and 1 day |
view feed xml
|
| Entries written to date: 24 |
|
