Friday 8 February, 2008

GAMEPLAY:

The second time around playing the game I began to ease up on finding and getting gems and actually started to enjoy finding them. The game still remained a very happy and upbeat tone as the levels increased. I realized that this game required a lot of going back to places where I had already been and a lot of exploring. When I learned or when Spyro learned how to swim, I went back in the level to find out there was a completely different underwater aspect to the game and I began to find more new locations. That’s one of the main aspects of my second game play that I really enjoyed, the ability of exploration, it really makes the game fun and worth the play.

DESIGN:

What I thought was innovative and really cool was the portal aspect. When I completed a level, I didn’t advance to the next level, lets say by walking, but by portal. When I had finished a level, at the end there was this portal and you could look into it and it would be a sky and instantly when you crossed through it, you were flying. I really liked that design aspect.

Another aspect of design that I really enjoyed was the tasks that I had to complete in some certain levels. It made the game much more intriguing and made the game very fun. Some examples include when I would have to hit a bunch of gems in a certain order while flying in order to brighten a larger gem. What made it fun was the fact I was able to fly as opposed to gliding, it was hard with the increased speed to get eat gem, in order, and in the end the reward a gem. These challenges made the game more exciting and I found myself wanting for more as the game progressed. The game makers as well did a very good job of mixing up levels; they were each different and had their own personalities. Again, they as well managed to keep the game very friendly and happy. I don’t think that a parent could refuse their child from playing such a game and I think that is why the game was rated E for everyone.

Your entries bring up some good points, but there isn't much elaboration. The design section in particular feels neglected. Also, there are some typos throughout, so make sure to proofread.


- David Seagal (Grader)